This essay is my thoughts about the process of listening, what is perceptive listening, how do we listen to music, what influences our listening and the art of relaxed listening.

10593215_10204994840499012_3021165280636600991_n

I never thought about listening. Being a musician myself, I spend much time listening: live performances, music on CDs, Internet, streaming and listening to my own playing. I always took it for granted until I had two unusual experiences in the concert halls that I would like to share with you. Both turned out to be useful learning experiences and inspired me to write a blog about the process of listening to music in general, what is perceptive listening, how we listen to music, what influences our listening and the art of relaxed listening.
I was lucky to get a ticket for a sold-out concert of my favorite pianist. The day turned out to be busy and full of unexpected meetings. So when the lights were being dimmed, I was feeling tired but my joy of anticipating a wonderful piano playing was immense! It was my first time hearing the maestro live! After the first bars, I knew that I was occupied by my inner thoughts rather than listening! The live sound was very different from the one I adored in his youtubes. I could not see the face expression of a pianist, only his body movements – what left me with the feeling of missing something important. My neighbors were enjoying the slow movements of sonatas far too much– up to the point of producing purr-like sounds in a half sleepy state of listening. My inquisitive mind was wandering between the soft pianissimo and the people sitting around me. Until the moment came where I had to admit to myself that my attention was not just riveted. The unknown sonata was stretched in time as if it had six movements and my expectations of a divine concert were not met. I was very eager to hear the reaction of the audience. The pianist got the standing ovations and the leading newspaper did not spare the superlatives in their feedback leaving me with an open question about my personal impression of this evening.
To give you one more idea about listening, I love thinking about one particular concert from the past. It was a big symphonic orchestra concert. The first piece was for piano solo. The famous virtuoso pianist walked onstage, sat down with a determined expression on his face and…sat there in silence and full concentration for four minutes and thirty-three seconds. Then he stood up, bowed and walked offstage. The audience and the orchestra were “frozen”, nobody moved, everybody was sitting and listening very intently. But to what? We had listened to John Cage’s “4’33”. This is the unique musical composition. It is performed without a single note being played. The idea behind this piece was to listen to the sounds in the auditorium: rustling, breathing, some traffic, occasional whispering, pages turning and forget about the judgement. In a way, John Cage wanted to show that music is all around us. He was pointing out that we only hear what we listen to. He taught us about how we listen to music.
So how do we listen to music? An author and composer Elliott Schwartz has some interesting insights in her book “Music: Ways of Listening“, originally published in 1982. She says that listening to music is not an inborn capacity but an acquired skill that can and should be trained. Some people are more sensitive to the sounds than others are. The classical music can sound very complex to untrained ears as it represents the hierarchical and highly structured system of notes with the interrelationships and dependencies. In our lives, we often hear the sounds only in isolation: for example, the humming of refrigerator, the first birds thrillers in the morning, the siren of the police but we do not relate these sounds in pattern.
All scientists agree that the most important aspect in listening to music is attention. It is simply crucial when it comes to lengthy pieces. Our time span is limited. Due to our busy schedules, we cannot afford the luxury of fresh attention all the time. Composers and performers use different tactics for handling it. Composers are very inventive, they bring variety into their compositions and musical structures of short and long pieces, for example, the full-scale sonatas present the same themes in different tonalities, in slightly modified ways, the repetitions etc.
Another criterion of perceptive listening is time. We all have our inner metronomes depending on our mood and activities. Music is the physical phenomenon that develops through time. Every musician has his/her own sense of time. The duration of notes, the sense of motion and flow, the placement of notes within a given rhythmus are never the same. I would like to refer you to Lang Lang youtubes of Liszt “Liebestraum” – the live recording will have different length – it is enough to listen to the starting bars to feel his sense of time on those days! What strikes me is the fact that if my inner clock-time has “presto” time, I will definitely have different perception of slow movements. There will be a conflict. If I am listening to a piece for the first time, there might be even a bigger discrepancy in time and duration perception. I would compare it with walking on an unknown road without a clear goal – it might be a big adventure with many discoveries when the time is flying or a long winding road that would lead somewhere.
While listening we are using our memory. Hearing the well-known melodies brings back not only musical memories but also the recollection of people, objects and situations associated with music. Memories bring mental pictures with them, the feelings and emotions. Surely in a positive as well as in a negative sense. When hearing the music for the first time, we tend to enjoy more the musical compositions with repeated elements or with simple melodies that stay in our ears. It is so much easier for our brain.
It is very difficult to listen to music objectively and dispassionately. Elliott Schwartz says, “All listeners approach a new piece with ears that have been “trained” by prejudices. ‘A new piece’ is much more than the sounds heard in a concert hall; it also consists of previous performances, recorded performances, the written notes on manuscript paper, and all the reviews and critiques of these written notes and performances, ad infinitum.” This explains the pleasurable experience I had with John Cage piece: I could enjoy this piece with fresh expectations and truly innocent ears.
This brings me to the idea of relaxed listening. The relaxed listening is a concept of active listening with full concentration and should not be mistaken for background and passive listening. When we have the pleasant and cosy surroundings, we feel relaxed and with our new calm self we are open for new music explorations.The music experience can bring new creative powers. The most youtube videos struggle to get through the 10 sec mark, but my experience was the music period of the 3 minutes. I believe in the emotional power of music through mindful listening with paying attention to the finest details. We all have vivid imagination and fantasy waiting to be awakened through music like a sleeping beauty.
What is your listening experiences? How do you listen to music? Have you noticed what influences your listening? What was your most striking music listening experience? What was your bad listening experience? I am looking forward to discussing this topic with you. Thank you for reading.

Country:

Posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , ,

Siete canciones populares españolas, by Manuel de Falla, is one of the most popular cycles of folk-songs in music history. Originally written for piano and voice, there are transcriptions for voice and guitar, cello and piano and two versions for orchestra.

Flamenco-1080x675

Siete canciones populares españolas (“Seven Spanish Folksongs”) is a cycle of traditional Spanish songs. Filtered and re-arranged for soprano and piano by Manuel de Falla in 1914, it quickly became one of the most popular set of Spanish songs. Originally dedicated to Madame Ida Godebska, who hosted regular gatherings for Parisian artists (like the Mallarmé tuesdays) and arranged for the first edition of the songs, the cycle is one of the most transcribed in music history since the times of Bach: there are arrangements for solo piano, voice and guitar, piano and cello and two versions for orchestra.

De Falla himself wrote: “In all honesty, I think that in popular song, the spirit is more important than the letter. The essential features of these songs are rhythm, tonality, and melodic intervals. The people themselves prove this by their infinite variations on the purely melodic lines of the songs.”

The songs derive from different regions of Spain, maintaining their original character and appeal without ever falling into cliché. All of them deal with love and everything that comes with it, joyful or painful. As it usually happens with great composers, De Falla added his own twist to the original songs, thus making them more interesting.

You can find a detailed analysis of each of them here:

http://www.gianmariagriglio.it/siete-canciones-populares-espanolas/

Country:Italy

Posted in Singer and tagged

Learning from History – is culture an option? Lessons from the Barock time. Essay after reading the article in DAMALS 9-2016 by Prof. Dr. Peter Hersche

Sometimes it makes sense to look back into the history. We would know much of what is happening to us beforehand. Perhaps we will find even answers to the open questions that move us today.
I would particularly like to refer to the Baroque period, the time from the 17th century to the first half of the 18th century. The time was marked by great events: the geocentric world image was questioned and the earth was no longer regarded as the center of the Universe. There were heated religious disputes. These disputes excerbated through the emergence of the Protestant church. The 30 years’ war left hunger and many diseases.
People longed for political order, security, clear social conditions and well-founded knowledge. The Baroque has addressed these needs, especially in the Catholic regions of Europe. A new culture has been established that focused on the tradition and sought stability. The idea of progress was re-defined. The compulsion in the society to “search for something new” was no longer regarded as a measure for politics and social development.
Thinking and acting were not focused on science, but on architecture and music. Within the social hierarchy, artists enjoyed a relatively high status, while merchants and entrepreneurship had little prestige, especially since their activity could have been morally questionable.
Compared to the Protestant countries, the Catholic countries were characterized by magnificent buildings and not so much by modern traffic routes for commerce. The military budget was also much lower in Catholic countries. Instead money was spent on cultural activities.
The beneficiary of this policy was not only the upper class. The public luxury of beautiful churches, sumptuous music and elaborate open-air festivals were also accessible to the middle and lower classes of the population.
Back to the present: Today we have many parallels to the emergence of Baroque culture. The global picture has also changed greatly in the course of globalization. In recent years, the religious clashes increased and suddenly there are wars that make many people to become refugees in other countries.
It is hardly surprising that people today are longing for more stability, political order and security as in the old baroque days.
Do you think that politics and our society will be increasingly turning to art and taking on topics such as literature, architecture, music, theater, dance, and painting?
It will be exciting to see whether in the coming years, the arts will become a meaningful part of everyday life, as in Baroque times and to find answers on the questions:
- Is culture also nowadays an option to give a society more stability?
- What kind of cultural activities could blossom?
- Who can be the driver for new developments?
I am looking forward to hearing your opinion! Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.

 

Country:Germany

Posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , ,

Pickwick was a great program from RAI TV. Last December the same RAI TV humiliated the RAI Orchestra in an unprecedented way.

5575467632_3eb1c52fe4_z

The art of loosing ground

Once upon a time, not that long ago, you could catch quite a few cultural programs on Italian national TV (the RAI). One of my all times favorites was Pickwick, a program dedicated to literature (contemporary and non) hosted by the brilliant Italian writer Alessandro Baricco (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandro_Baricco). Baricco himself has always been very close to classical music – see his essay “L’anima di Hegel e le mucche del Wisconsin”, a witty analysis of the avant-garde period among other things – and more often than not the program had a special guest sitting at the piano: Roberto Cognazzo.

To many of you this name probably means nothing. I had the good fortune of playing a concert with him many years ago and have rarely met anybody after with such a deep knowledge of music. And I don’t mean academical knowledge or good memory of historical facts. I mean in depth understandings of the mechanics of composition related to each composer.

This quality, coupled with his extraordinary improvisational abilities, let him do pretty much whatever he wanted to on the keyboard. Starting from nowhere, you could hear him paraphrase Tchaikowsky’s fourth symphony as a galop, bridge to Beethoven’s ninth symphony and land on La Boheme.

See here (https://youtu.be/5ReEQlkU6F8) and here (https://youtu.be/jRRNBZZJ5M0) for a couple of examples.

Times change. RAI TV made use of the RAI Orchestra (or Italian National Orchestra) to play for a Bocelli show at the beginning of last December: but not for real. They actually used a playback track. From a different orchestra (the London Symphony). RAI TV also moved some players around – apparently some of them in the first violins section were not telegenic enough. You can read the full article here (sorry but it’s only in Italian): http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/politica/rai-nuovo-show-fantozziano-umiliata-lorchestra-sinfonica-1210647.html

Now, the RAI Orchestra (http://www.orchestrasinfonica.rai.it/) is one of the finest institutions in the music world, it’s a government financed organization which gets humiliated by another government financed organization, where, apparently, knowing the difference between a professional orchestra and dilettantes is overrated.

I wish I could have started 2016 with a happier post, but these things just make my blood boil.

Country:Italy

Posted in Uncategorized and tagged

What can we learn from creative process of Pablo Picasso?

picasso linkedin blog

Imagine asking Pablo Picasso, one of the most innovative painters and inventor of Cubism, what he thinks about creativity! In 2008, Apple University had a training program for new hires to learn to think like Picasso. The digitalization gurus were not intimidated by the weird Picasso’s thought that “computers are useless. They can only give you answers.” All people can be creative and Apple sees creativity as a big success factor.
For me it was Pablo Picasso who changed my way of thinking. I was learning a new piece by Johann Sebastian Bach and was indulging in the beauty of the music up to the point where I had a feeling that I am not playing up to my capabilities and I just did not know what to do to improve my interpretation. The beauty of the piece and seeming perfection of the melody were preventing me from playing it well. The eye opening was the Picasso’s phrase that the beauty arises out of the destruction - “Every act of creation is first of all an act of destruction.” I understood this phrase as a challenge to throw away or destroy all pre-conceptions, fixed thoughts and ideas, ready answers and start from the scratch. I decided not to take the creativity of a great composer Bach and the beauty of his creation as something sacred. It was an invitation to start my own creative process. “Everybody has the same energy potential. The average person wastes his in a dozen little ways. I bring mine to bear on one thing only: my paintings”
There are people who have new ideas every day, it is a rare and precious talent but everybody can have plenty of ideas too, it is only the question of freeing them. “I begin with an idea and then it becomes something else” I love the thought of starting a new idea without a rigid plan but with a flexible mindset that would allow more variations of an original idea. Try it out – it is true for any subject. “You have to have an idea of what you are going to do, but it should be a vague idea. An idea is a point of departure and no more. As soon as you elaborate it, it becomes transformed by thought”
Pablo Picasso believes that the successful people do not see any hindrances in the development of their ideas. “Others have seen what is and asked why. I have seen what could be and asked why not. ” The idea becomes you and leads you further. The employees of “Google” are encouraged to put a question “what if..”, it is a productive way of using fantasy at work too.
Technological progress proves that “everything you can imagine is real.” “There is only one way to see things, until someone shows us how to look at them with different eyes” This is a change of perspective advice that can bring new vision.
Picasso teaches us to have a solid foundation - “Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.” Lifelong learning was important for him; he was constantly pushing the borders and developing his skills: “I am always doing that which I cannot do, in order that I may learn how to do it.”
Some people think that having more time, more money and more of anything will bring more creativity, but the lessons of Pablo Picasso prove the opposite. He was radical in his restrictions but at the same time, he was innovative in the use of very concise means. “For a long time I limited myself to one color—as a form of discipline.” If I do not have red, I will take blue.”
Picasso was never tired of experimenting and trying. He was doing hundreds of sketches of the same object until he was happy with the result. The continuous iteration led to outcomes that are more creative. “Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working.” “Action is the foundational key to all success.”
My favorite lesson was Picasso’s advice “Bad artists copy. Good artists steal.” By “stealing” Picasso thinks of going one level deeper, learning about what you like about the thing you copy and making it your own by incorporating some elements from it.
He was not afraid of negative feedback. He was so devoted to the result that he just never thought of not achieving it. “I do not seek. I find.” “He can who thinks he can, and he can’t who thinks he can’t. This is an inexorable, indisputable law.” “Only one person has the right to criticize me. It’s Picasso.”
Hmm, not afraid of negative feedback? Personally, I am not sure about this one… Read more about the power of negative feedback and how to deal with it in my blog next Monday!

Country:Germany

Posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , ,

In an era when many symphony orchestras are struggling financially and to attract new and younger audiences, Robert Adams of MrAMusicPlace.net analyzes a list of the top 25 classical works for it tells us about what audiences want.

MrA_Image

Developing new and younger audiences for classical music is of interest to those who teach music, and to those who run venues and ensembles that present classical music. One of the things that attracts audiences to concert halls is favorite repertoire being on the program. Contemporary composers of classical music have at times been at odds with audiences, because their music was not what people wanted to hear. While much has been written about the lack of appeal that atonal and aleatoric music has to audiences, it’s more important to know what audiences do like and do want to hear. With this information, purveyors of classical music will have guidance as they work to attract an audience outside the tried, true and aging faithful. A list of the top 100 classical music pieces found on kickassclassical.com provides some interesting food for thought. Let’s look at what is there.

While there are really no surprises on the list, what I find particularly interesting are the keywords associated with each piece. I counted the number of times each keyword shows up in the top 25 pieces; here is what I found. Four pieces or 16% (rank 3, 6, 15, 19) are matched with key words that are or suggestive of life events. Ten of them, or 40% (rank 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 14, 16, 22, & 23) are matched with key words that are or suggestive of emotions, and half of these are in the top ten. Five, or 20% pieces are associated with the word cartoon. This is born out in my classes. Students will invariably get the most excited and motivated to listen when they hear classical music that they recognize from or that sounds like music they have heard in cartoons.

Another interesting finding from this list is that all of the top five and 8 of the top ten have prominent rhythm in the themes. This produces an overall more driving, active kind of music, and it also results in a more explicit beat. This last point I believe is key. Young people in particular enjoy the heavy rhythm and beat emphasis of popular music. I have observed in my classes that the more rhythm and beat are prominent in a classical work, the more likely it is that they will enjoy that piece. Though not on the list, it is worth mentioning that among contemporary composers, the minimalists, including John Adams and Philip Glass, have been among the most popular, and that minimalist music is much more rhythmic than other styles.

It is also noteworthy that 15 of the top 25 pieces were written in the 19th century, and that the two most popular composers on the list are Beethoven (3) and Tchaikovsky (2). If my students are any indication, it appears likely that Beethoven’s popularity is driven in large part by two works, one of which (surprisingly) did not make the list: the fifth symphony, and Fur Elise. Tchaikovsky gets heavy promotion in the United States every American Independence Day (when the 1812 overture is common fare) and every Christmas season with the innumerable productions of The Nutcracker.

In general, I could conclude that pieces that have been worked into popular culture are also the most popular in the symphonic concert hall. Between weddings, holiday celebrations and films, many of the pieces on this list are familiar to a large population of people who have rarely or never been to a symphony orchestra concert. That familiarity breeds popularity is a well worn adage in the popular music industry, which relies on heavily promoted concerts and frequent plays on radio stations to popularize its product, and it was well understood by Richard Rodgers, who once explained that he could pick a song from a show and make it popular by placing it in the overture, in the first act, in the n’tract, and reprised in the second act. By the tie the audience left, they had heard the song four times and were humming it on their way home.

Singablility may well be another hallmark of more popular classical pieces. The bottom half of the list also includes many pieces made well known by use in popular media, but many of these have less lyric melodies. These works include Grieg’s Piano Concerto (used in Adrian Lyne’s 1997 film Lolita), Lacrimosa from Mozart’s Requiem (used in a recent DirectTV commercial), Overture to The Magic Flute, “Mars The Bringer of War” from Holst’s The Planets (used often in Carl Sagan’s Cosmos and referenced in the opening bars of “(Imperial March” from Star Wars), and even “March” from The Nutcracker, which comes in at only number 75. In conclusion, it may be that the most popular classical pieces strongly appeal to at least one emotion, are already popular to audiences through popular media, and are comprised largely of memorable and singable melodies.

Country:USA

Posted in Uncategorized and tagged ,

Essay about musicians and emotions, the role of music in increasing empathy, the reputation of musicians being highly sensitive, thoughts on creative mind, chills, empathy exercises

12034234_907080852707981_3008760655069931736_o

Isn’t it a dream of every one of us to have a partner who would pick up the most subtle nuance in a conversation and would understand what we are intending to say but do not want to put into words? I guess you doubt if there is such a person in this world. However, the scientists are optimistic and suggest that you should find a musician! The recent research shows that an early musical training would teach a person to understand every emotional cue in speech. It teaches to hear very precisely every changes of tone and recognize the emotions in sound – very valuable quality in our everyday life!
The daily processing of acoustic tones and especially the efficiency of the processing helps to show incredible results: Richard Ashley, associate professor of music cognition at Northwestern, found that musicians might be able to sense emotions in sound after hearing them for only 50 milliseconds–just 1/20th of a second! Oliver Grewe, a biologist and musicologist, points out that the gift of quickly identifying emotion has implications in all arenas of interpersonal communication. Beside the better language proficiency, a musician would be able to hear your voice in a noisy crowd and might even follow what you are saying… This quality is obvious even for a non-musician if they observe the orchestra where individual voices of instruments intertwine into a beautiful carpet of a whole symphonic work!
But you do not need to be a professional musician to excel in an empathy – an ability to recognize, interpret and respond appropriately to the emotions of others. The scientists from the Cambridge University David M. Greenberg, Peter J. Rentfrow and Simon Baron-Cohen say that listening to music can increase empathy. They raise a whole range of interesting questions like what kind of music can increase empathy, can music decrease empathy, based on musical preferences and thinking styles.
I particularly like a simple exercise that helps to train the empathy that I know from my early musical training: ask yourself what the music makes you feel during listening to a particular piece and try to find one word to describe your feelings. This exercise is not trivial, I tried it with several musicians and even they found it tricky with some pieces but if you do repeatedly, it brings fruits!
A neuroscientist Jens Wöllner (2012) showed that people with higher levels of empathy are able to perceive and identify a musician’s intentions with greater accuracy than those with lower levels. So it is a positive circle: the more empathic you are, the more receptive you are to the performance of a musician who is also empathic and communicates the emotions. It leads to greater enjoyment of musical performance and increases the chance of experiencing chills – strong emotional moments. I like the quotation of Oliver Groewe: “Music is a recreative activity. Even if it is relaxing to listen to, the listener has to recreate its meaning, the feelings it expresses. It is the listener who gives life to the emotions in music.” Another psychological trick – projection – does the rest of the game. A singer Joni Mitchell said in an interview: “The trick is if you listen to that music and you see me, you’re not getting anything out of it. If you listen to that music and you see yourself, it will probably make you cry and you’ll learn something about yourself and now you’re getting something out of it.”
But how much empathy is healthy? Professional musicians have a reputation of being overtly emotional and highly sensitive – not a necessarily positive quality to put up with in a daily life. Another statistics show high rates of depression among musicians due to too many stimuli and failed filtration. It is very informative to go through internet blogs where there are heated debates if it is true. (I would refer you to Google – just type in “are musicians highly sensitive/emotional?) Musicians work with nuances that would not be possible without high sensitivity. It is a philosophical question if musicians are born with fragile mind to permit the perception of various stimuli or if they develop it during their lifetime. The richness of sensory details that life provides belong to the “virtues” of high sensitivity. I am thinking of more intensity in everything around us: more subtle shades in clothing, more refined taste while eating, the fragrances and smells in nature and surely the sounds in our daily environment. The perception depends not only on higher sensitivity but also on ability to concentrate. Again something, musicians learn in their music training.
Pearl Buck, an American Pulitzer prize novelist, finds the right words for a creative mind of a musician.
“The truly creative mind in any field is no more than this: A human creature born abnormally, inhumanely sensitive. To them…a touch is a blow, a sound is a noise, a misfortune is a tragedy, a joy is an ecstasy, a friend is a lover, a lover is a god, and failure is death.”
What are your thoughts? Do you agree with the stereotype of an emotional musician? Do you think music can teach us to learn about our emotions and recognize them in others? Do you know some interesting exercises for it? Thank you for reading.

 

Country:

Posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , ,