1
VideosA. Douglas Biggs DMA lives in Fern Creek, Kentucky, just outside of Louisville, where he works as a composer, arranger, and music editor. His work spans a wide range of styles and genres and is the creator of numerous works for orchestra, band, chamber music, chorus, and vocal solo, as well as video, film and game projects. His life-long love of jazz and latin music often informs his work as do his many years ofÃÂ experience as a pianist, both jazz and classical, and as a professional operatic tenor and recitalist
What does music mean to you personally?
As you would imagine, it means many things. On the practical side, it has
fed my family, educated my children, and bought our house. It has taught
me perseverance, how to pursue excellence and exposed me to many new
ideas and concepts. I have had the privilege of performing in interesting
places with tremendous people and the opportunity to share my music with
the same. Music has been the source of great joy, pain, and personal
growth and shown me that truth can sometimes be found in an imperfect
performance.
Do you agree that music is all about fantasy?
In a general sense I would agree, but consider that music can also be
“about” the use for which it is composed. Some pretty great music has
been composed for sound tracks or incidental music for theater where you
are faced with filling a 20 second bit of stage business or a 12 second
reaction shot. Music perhaps more about function than fantasy yet still
needs to be expressive and meaningful. This brings into the conversation
the concept of high art versus low art, yet still art. Composing
arrangements and adaptations for use in churches and community
functions may not be of the highest aesthetic, but still useful and important
to those who perform it.
If you were not a professional musician, what would you have been?
Sports, as a participant or coach, has been a big part of my life. I could see
myself dedicating myself to helping young people grow and learn as a
coach. Also, I have always enjoyed making and fixing things. I might have
looked to be a chef, perhaps an architect or a person who restores vintage
homes, furniture or cars.
The classical music audience is getting old, are you worried about the
future?
This is a worry that has been faced by every generation since the first piece
of music was offered for public performance. For too long, we have assumed that “new” music will turn people off. Presenters have pursued
increasingly desperate ways of selling an old product, that the larger
audience, at least in the US, associated with negative impressions. We
also need to shake ourselves loose of the idea that the only way to interact
with the public is in the traditional concert. In recent years, with new
technology, the way that the public interacts with our music is evolving,
your program is a perfect example. New ways of monetizing art by making
music, print and audio, available through different venues, offers
composers and performers additional ways to be self-supporting while
reaching new listeners. AS a side note, new music and “how-tos
at the click of a button, in the privacy of one’s home, can encourage
potential new players to take up an instrument that they had set aside, or
new one altogether.
What do you envision the role of music to be in the 21st century? Do
you see that there is a transformation of this role?
I would see this as a partial extension of the previous question, really. I
think the last 10 or 15 years has already seen a transformation, and a wider
audience encounters and engages with new art every day that never did
before. This is not just through user initiated engagement, but the added
ability for musicians to spread word about themselves, their performances,
and their digital offerings. I often learn of concerts in my area through social
media now that print media has stopped being useful for such
announcements. Frankly, many of our potential listeners do not have
access to a concert venue and the ability to reach an audience in different
ways is transformative in and of itself. There will always be a place for
traditional venues, particularly if they become more inclusive of art that is
“about” the modern audience. Sustained outreach to new groups and
becoming more embedded in their own communities is a strong method to
build grass roots support that does not alienate the nontraditional concert-
goer.
Do you think that the musician today needs to be more creative?
What is the role of creativity in the musical process for you?
Creativity is of course fundamental to what we do. It seems obvious when
you say it, but I am constantly amazed by the flow of new performances, works, pictures, dances, all of it at our fingertips via the internet. The
constant collisions of new sounds and ideas is amazing. Just spending an
afternoon going through things on Soundcloud, Youtube, or any of the other
sites is eye-opening. Some of it is good, some not so successful, but
energetic and fresh. There is also the process whereby newer eyes take a
look at older forms and styles, very accomplished 20 year olds playing tin
pan alley, French jazz, blues, or Bee-Bop with energy as they discover
something new to them. I find this all enjoyable and inspiring.
For me, I try to be creative in finding something unique to say, no matter
the language, tonality, or instrumentation. I am not one of those who think
“it has all been done before,” but rather find something that will touch a
listener whether it be an arrangement of a well-known hymn, a solo piano
piece, chamber music or grand opera.
Do you think we as musicians can do something to attract the
younger generation to music concerts? How would you do this?
Don’t make a big deal about age. Careers can begin at any age really.
Speak and share honestly, recognizing and encouraging what you admire
and not being overly negative about what you do not. Not everyone is
looking for a lesson, perhaps they are simply sharing from one set of ears
and heart to another. That being said, I have found that young people are
pretty much open to new things, new music - often rejecting them before
experiencing for social or cultural reasons, much as we might reject their
art. If you can get past that initial knee-jerk rejection much is possible.
Sharing music on an equal footing, while being open to sharing in their art
is the way to go.
Tell us about your creative process. What is your favorite piece
(written by you) and how did you start working on it?
I have a special place in my heart for a little arrangement of LOW HOW A
ROSE E’ER BLOOMING that I wrote some years ago. It is a simple conceit
transformed to 7/8 meter that seems to suit the piece, giving it a charming
lilt.
As for my creative process, a lot of it depends on the size of the project. I
spend a good bit of time at the piano with paper and pencil in hand. I orchestrate at the computer as many people do. I do a bit of rough
planning, giving some thought to form, often this is suggested when
working with a lyric or poem. I then being to draft in chunks, usually, pulling
ideas together associated with certain sections or words which I then craft
into the larger work, providing links or expanding on those ideas as I find
necessary. I am one those will often discard things as they prove not
suitable – a bit of a hammer and tongs sort of process.
Can you give some advice for young people who want to discover
classical music for themselves?
I think that the way to approach this is emphasize that classical music is not
just “old.” Not just Mozart, Beethoven, or even Stravinsky or Copland but
many composers who are of an age and cultural understanding of the
“young people” we are trying to draw in. Making this connection, perhaps
starting with smaller works, demonstrating that this type of music is also
“about” them is a way to bring them along to the broader world of art music.
Then the larger world of music can open for them.
Do you think about the audience when composing?
Yes I do, but for various reasons. The initial ideas, not so much, but when
working to a finished product it can sometimes be important that the
audience have a chance to react in a way that I intend. Of course that is for
more of a “purpose” written music, for church or theater, or something
similar. I will ask myself, for example when composing a song cycle, is the
audience going to receive what I am trying express? At other times, I am
comfortable with letting the music stand on its own and letting the cards fall
as they will. Will it work or not?
What projects are coming up? Do you experiment in your projects?
I have recently completed work on a new opera MARIETTE IN ECSTASY
which I am very excited about. I am in the final stages of completing the full
score and looking for partners for a workshop or production. The piece was
begun by an old friend, composer Henry Mollicone, a creator of numerous
operas including FACE IN THE BAR ROOM FLOOR and HOTEL EDEN. I
had been Henry’s editor and engraver for many years and, as such was part of the project along with librettist Judith Fein. Sadly, Henry passed
away during the process and I was asked to complete it by Henry’s wife,
and Ms. Fein. It was something completely new for me, and could be
thought of as an experiment at times. I was an operatic tenor for many
years, and have some experience with conducting so not a complete naif.
Having a canvas that was so large was tremendously liberating with so
much space to attempt things I had always wanted to try.
On another note, I mentioned my little arrangement of LO HOW A ROSE
earlier: an SATB version of that piece is due to be premiered in the
upcoming Christmas season. Something to look forward to.
Copyrights © 2019 Moving Classics TV All Rights Reserved.